Compass is still in development. Join the waitlist to be notified when early access opens.
Compass results · Ari
Generated August 25, 2026
Ari's pattern is practical and investigative: figure out what is actually wrong, then build something that holds. Focus stays high when the work is concrete and the feedback is quick. This is a direction, not a verdict — it points at families of work worth trying, and a few things worth testing before committing.
Your Strongest Direction
Strong spatial and mechanical reasoning showed up in the challenges, and interests lean Realistic + Investigative.
A direction is a family of work worth exploring. It is not an assignment.
Interest Fit
Strong
Aptitude Fit
Very Strong
Work-Style Fit
Strong
Lifestyle Fit
Strong
Fit shown for the top matching path, Biomedical Equipment Technician. Each ring lights one segment per evidence step: Emerging, Moderate, Strong, Very Strong.
What This Means
The evidence points most clearly toward Applied Engineering & Systems (Very Strong). That is a family of work, not a job title, and it surfaced because several sources line up rather than because of any single answer.
In the Strength Lab, the strongest performance evidence was in Spatial Visualization, Troubleshooting, Pattern / Inductive Reasoning. Those are things Ari did, not things Ari claimed.
Observers rated Persistence and Leadership higher than Ari did. That gap is worth paying attention to; it usually means a strength that feels ordinary from the inside.
How complete the picture is after each part. Not a measure of ability.
Evidence depth after each part of the Compass journey. 56 percent of the planned evidence has been collected so far. This describes how complete the picture is, not ability.
Evidence patterns
Six strength dimensions across three sources of evidence. Read down a column to see whether the sources agree.
| Evidence source | Analytical Reasoning | Spatial Thinking | Communication | Collaboration | Practical Problem Solving | Creativity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength Labwhat you did | ||||||
| Self-reportwhat you said | ||||||
| Observerswhat others saw |
7 of 18 cells have evidence so far. Blank cells mean that source has not spoken to that dimension yet, not that the strength is low.
From the Strength Lab
Performance evidence from the challenges. Labels, not percentiles.
Strength Lab evidence across 7 reasoning areas. Strongest labels: Spatial Visualization (Very Strong) and Troubleshooting (Very Strong). Each spoke reaches one of four evidence labels.
Demonstrated strengths
The same evidence as a ranked list.
Self-view vs observed
Where someone who has watched you work sees more than you rated yourself. Neither view is wrong.
Ari rated this in the middle. A teacher consistently sees Ari stay with a problem after the first approach fails. Both readings can be true — self-ratings often lag what others watch happen.
Ari does not describe himself as a leader; a coach reports he is usually the one who reorganizes the group when a plan collapses. Worth testing in a setting Ari chooses.
Only part of the Strength Lab is finished, so there isn't enough evidence yet to say much here.
How you like to work
Your own answers, corroborated by observers where they had something to add. Neither end of any slider is better.
Independent to Collaborative
Whether you do your best thinking alone or in the middle of a group.
Structured to Flexible
How much you want the plan settled before you start versus figuring it out as you go.
Persistence
Very StrongSelf-report + observer agreement
Detail / Precision Orientation
StrongSelf-report + observer agreement
Sliders appear only where both ends of a preference were measured separately. Other traits are shown on their own so nothing is forced into a fake opposite.
Your terms
These are yours. No observer and no algorithm gets to change them.
Where the evidence points
Directions, not assignments. Each one is a family of work worth exploring, with the reason it surfaced.
3 career directions ranked by evidence label. Directions are broad families of work; individual job titles are listed separately.
Zoom out
Broad neighborhoods of work that fit the pattern. Start here rather than with a single job title.
Mechanical, civil, manufacturing, product and industrial design.
Electrical, HVAC, machining, robotics maintenance, automation tech.
Imaging, biomedical equipment, prosthetics and orthotics.
Planning, process improvement, field operations.
Four kinds of fit, reported separately
A career can fit your interests and still not fit the life you want. Compass keeps these apart on purpose.
Health Technology
Keeps hospital equipment working and safe: diagnosing, repairing, and verifying. Concrete problems, real stakes, quick feedback.
Why this fit: Aptitude Fit is the strongest signal here (Very Strong); Lifestyle Fit is the one to check (Strong).
Interest Fit
Strong
Aptitude Fit
Very Strong
Work-Style Fit
Strong
Lifestyle Fit
Strong
Engineering & Design
Turns designs into things that hold up — testing, prototyping, and fixing what the drawing missed.
Why this fit: Interest Fit is the strongest signal here (Very Strong); Lifestyle Fit is the one to check (Moderate).
Interest Fit
Very Strong
Aptitude Fit
Strong
Work-Style Fit
Strong
Lifestyle Fit
Moderate
What others saw
Independent views from adults who have watched you work, separated by source.
Teacher
Persistence
Very StrongAri rated this in the middle. A teacher consistently sees Ari stay with a problem after the first approach fails. Both readings can be true — self-ratings often lag what others watch happen.
Coach
Leadership
StrongAri does not describe himself as a leader; a coach reports he is usually the one who reorganizes the group when a plan collapses. Worth testing in a setting Ari chooses.
Observers are shown by role only. They answered independently and did not see any self-ratings.
Before you commit
Cheap experiments that turn a maybe into evidence.
Keep moving
Compass is a career-exploration and educational-planning tool. It is not a psychological diagnosis, an IQ test, or an employment-selection assessment, and it does not report population norms or percentiles.
Compass reports labels (Very Strong, Strong, Moderate, Emerging) rather than percentiles, and marks how much evidence sits behind each claim. Results describe directions worth exploring, never what a person should be.